PDA

View Full Version : DreamWorks and Aardman go their seperate ways


MonkeyFunk
10-03-2006, 05:14 AM
From NY Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/03/business/media/03animation.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1159877178-GJvWHCQ3VjOkWrkRVj7BcA) (use BugMeNot (http://www.bugmenot.com/) to read the whole thing):

DreamWorks recently had a creative tussle with a partner, Aardman Animation, the British producer of two movies released by DreamWorks, “Wallace and Gromit” and the coming “Flushed Away.” While “Wallace and Gromit” was critically acclaimed, American audiences did not like it and the movie brought in only $56 million at the domestic box office.

Aardman executives chafed at the creative control DreamWorks tried to exert, particularly with “Flushed Away,” according to people apprised of the situation who asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of the relationship.

As a result, the two companies have decided to split and Aardman is expected to begin looking for a new distributor in the United States, said the people. Aardman executives did not return phone calls seeking comment. A DreamWorks spokesman said the studio had no immediate plans to make movies with Aardman after “Flushed Away.”

lupercal
10-03-2006, 06:34 AM
Yes! Yes! Thank you God!

Though I suppose they'll hook up with some other boring 3D company.

But at least it won't be Bad Dreamworks.

Loop

athena
10-03-2006, 08:55 AM
Actually, from what I understand, Aardman has its own 3D division. Dreamworks was just their distributor, not their 3D supplier. ;)

MonkeyFunk
10-03-2006, 09:30 AM
Aardman has a CGI division that's used for commercials, short films and TV, but from what I hear Flushed Away was actually animated by the DreamWorks crew. I'm guessing Aardman's own CGI isn't up to feature films yet...