lupercal
08-26-2006, 01:37 PM
I've been thinking about the Balto seqiels - I can't help it; they're staring me in the face every time I look at the top 5's - and I'm going to reitterate a sentiment I expressed a couple of years ago.
I think 'Wolf Quest' is a better film than 'Wings of Change' in many ways. At the time I thought 'narrowly', now I think 'pretty clearly'. I know I'm in a minority of about 1 on this, so I'll just condense my previous arguments:
On the whole, Balto 3 (Wings of Change) was a smoother and better realised film, with no real clunks in in it, apart from the awful Stella. By comparison, Balto 2 (Wolf Quest) had 2D that clashed glaringly against CGI, its plot ruined the ending of the original, and it had a horrible final act (except for the very end, which was good) and some crap songs.
But I stand by what I've always said: Wolf Quest aimed high and fell short. Wings of Change aimed low and pulled it off because it wasn't difficult.
The whole concept of Wolf Quest was original, and had it really worked, it could have been a great sequel. Even as it is, it's not bad. Its makers seemed to have a real vision to do something new. 'Wings of Change', ironically, is more like a return to the original film. Less adventerous or original.
All things taken into account, I rate them both about 3 stars. I just think their strengths are in different areas, but WQ is sadly derided when compared with WoC.
Is there anybody in this lonely universe who can see what I'm getting at?
I think 'Wolf Quest' is a better film than 'Wings of Change' in many ways. At the time I thought 'narrowly', now I think 'pretty clearly'. I know I'm in a minority of about 1 on this, so I'll just condense my previous arguments:
On the whole, Balto 3 (Wings of Change) was a smoother and better realised film, with no real clunks in in it, apart from the awful Stella. By comparison, Balto 2 (Wolf Quest) had 2D that clashed glaringly against CGI, its plot ruined the ending of the original, and it had a horrible final act (except for the very end, which was good) and some crap songs.
But I stand by what I've always said: Wolf Quest aimed high and fell short. Wings of Change aimed low and pulled it off because it wasn't difficult.
The whole concept of Wolf Quest was original, and had it really worked, it could have been a great sequel. Even as it is, it's not bad. Its makers seemed to have a real vision to do something new. 'Wings of Change', ironically, is more like a return to the original film. Less adventerous or original.
All things taken into account, I rate them both about 3 stars. I just think their strengths are in different areas, but WQ is sadly derided when compared with WoC.
Is there anybody in this lonely universe who can see what I'm getting at?