A billion years in the making, 'Steamboy' is the long awaited new feature film from the director of 'Akira'.
This is a movie which starts out amazingly, but eventually collapses under its own weight.
The 'amazing' part? It just LOOKS absolutely astonishing. Perhaps it should be a must-see film for no other reason than this. In fact it is the first, and so far the only film I have seem which doesn't just cram 2D and 3D together in a relatively inconspicuous way, it actually melds them together into an entirely new visual form, which is both 2D and 3D at the same time, but rarely gives away just how heavily computer generated it is. It really looks like an amazingly detailed 2D movie.
The whole period setting of soot-ridden Manchester circa 1900, which occupies most of the early part of the film, is gorgeously realised, too. The accents are great, the attention to detail is to drool over.
(minor spoilers ahead)
Jame's grandfather entrusts him with a mysterious metal ball which promises unlimited power. But the bad guys are out to get it, and James ends up being chased down to London where his father is putting on an exhibition involving a gigantic steam-powered, floating city (just in case you missed it, this is a sort of parallel universe tale. There have never been gigantic, steam-powered floating cities in Britain, to the best of my knowledge, though there may have been some in Sweden.)
Unfortunately if you were thinking this all sounds too good to be true, you'd be right. There is serious trouble in paradise.
The first sign of this is the worrying fact that the surname of the family is 'Steam'. That's right. Steamboy literally is Steam-Boy, because he's James Steam. The idea that a family who specialise in steam power should have the surname 'steam' is so absurd that you wonder how much the writers thought about the characters. In this world, are there other families with surnames like 'rugby player' or 'politician'? Unfortunately this lack of attention to the characters becomes more obvious during the second part of the film, which becomes largely obsessed with huge pieces of hissing machinery exploding noisily and seemingly without end. One character is added - the completely pointless 'Scarlett O'Hara' (what the hell is this all about?)
What really wrecks the ending though (if you can call the second half of the movie an 'ending') is the same thing that wrecked the end of 'Akira'. It seems that Otamu just can't resist tediously long sequences where things fly up in the air and explode. Trust me, if you like seeing gigantic things hanging in the air, blowing steam everywhere and popping rivets, you'll fall in love with 'Steamboy'.
Steamboy promised so much - the first half hour is just gobsmacking - but it eventually surrenders to its director's lack of understanding of characterisation and pacing. And I'm sorry, having Patrick Stewart raving on about how it's the most remarkable animated film ever made, isn't going to change my mind.
You should have a look at this, just to be dazzled by the visuals, but I can't bring myself to give it 3 stars. If, however, it had remained as strong as the first 30 minutes, we might have been looking at 4.
Someone should kidnap Otamu's technical crew and give them to someone who knows how to tell a story, and who understands that the climax starts near the end, not half-way through.